Want to take part in these discussions? Sign in if you have an account, or apply for one below
Vanilla 1.1.10 is a product of Lussumo. More Information: Documentation, Community Support.
Posted By: EVLWNSHmmm, most badass Christian I can think of at the moment is Richard the Lionheart. A man who charges up a beach while armoured like a motherfucker and hefting a shield and sword before tearing into his enemy, leading his troops from the front to liberate a city and then an entire region - largely by scaring the shit out of an entire army by charging them on horseback - has to be considered pretty badass.
Posted By: EVLWNSI don't think so. Probably because he was both the King of England and French - and as I understand it neither of those things would be very popular to American audiences.
EDIT: Oh yeah, and the land he conquered was the land of Palestine, so that's a bit too touchy, especially with the bigwigs of Hollywood.
Posted By: breezyspreezybeautiful poetry, stories about overcoming poverty, stories about love, stories about overcoming weakness, stories about good overcoming evil. and tons to let your imagination run wild at the end of the book.:)sitting in a hand-basket, expecting to get roasted
Posted By: EVLWNSProbably because he was both the King of England and French
Posted By: ProletariatTreeHugerPosted By: breezyspreezybeautiful poetry, stories about overcoming poverty, stories about love, stories about overcoming weakness, stories about good overcoming evil. and tons to let your imagination run wild at the end of the book.:)sitting in a hand-basket, expecting to get roasted
Don't you mean stories and morals about rape, murder, genocide, slavery, human rights violations, and omnipotent douchebaggery?
Posted By: InfernoPosted By: EVLWNSProbably because he was both the King of England and French
I'm way late for this but: Wrong. He was the King of the English only. He was count of some French regions for some times (war waging between the two countries) but never their King. Phillip II was the French King at that time.
Posted By: EVLWNSHe was the great-great-grandson of William the Conquerer (aka. William the Bastard), a Frenchman whose progeny became the rulers of England (see "1066 and all that"). He was the son of the French, he spoke French, engaged in French culture, and lived in France rather than his kingdom. He was undisputably French, and I'm guessing that he would have felt himself French before he considered himself genuinely English.I concur:Inferno
Posted By: JeevesWhat's so great about Kansas? Just because 2 of their songs songs are above average doesn't make them amazing!If God made everything, he must live in China!
Posted By: EVLWNSBeing born in a country does not automatically make you of that country.
Posted By: demented cookiesPosted By: JeevesWhat's so great about Kansas? Just because 2 of their songs songs are above average doesn't make them amazing!If God made everything, he must live in China!
That's a matter of opinion. You have said some black metal bands are amazing, when in someone else's opinion it may just be loud noise.
Posted By: JeevesHmmm. What a coincidence, all the songs you named just HAPPEN to be on the "Greatest Hits" list.
DC, you mentioned 7 good songs. Kansas has been together for what, 40 years???
As an approximation, that's one good song every... 6 years??
?If God made everything, he must live in China!
Posted By: breezyspreezy@proletariattreehugger
haha! you've skipped over alot of books(within the book you're talking about) if that's what you think is all it consists of. and nobody said anything about reading it to your children.sitting in a hand-basket, expecting to get roasted
Posted By: PoemOf4LettersHey I think one good song makes a band a success.
Posted By: ProletariatTreeHugerOk, then would you allow me to read it to your children? Any section of my choosing.
Posted By: breezyspreezyit depends, how old are they at the time? what is their EQ/IQ and would you be discussing the section with them afterwards? more importantly would IIIII be discussing it with them afterwards?
Posted By: ProletariatTreeHugerconcurquote
- CommentAuthorProletariatTreeHuger
- CommentTime1 day ago
Posted By: breezyspreezyit depends, how old are they at the time? what is their EQ/IQ and would you be discussing the section with them afterwards? more importantly would IIIII be discussing it with them afterwards?
If it's truly the good book, then what needs to be discussed? Assuming they are old enough to actually understand what's being said, language etc. They there is no need for you to "discuss" (spin) it afterwards.
I would just read it to them, and let them make their own assessments. Why would you need to tell them how to think about certain passages?
If you need to discuss everything after reading it, is it the book that's good or is it your own personal interpretation.
Posted By: breezyspreezyi know. this is where you get mad at me for being a cherry-picker. i wouldn't let you read the bible to my kids UNLESS you put the passage in children's words and made it sensitive to their influencability and emotional maturity.
Posted By: breezyspreezyi know. this is where you get mad at me for being a cherry-picker. i wouldn't let you read the bible to my kids UNLESS you put the passage in children's words and made it sensitive to their influencability and emotional maturity.
Posted By: ProletariatTreeHugerconcurquote
- CommentAuthorProletariatTreeHuger
- CommentTime11 hours ago
But mommy (breezy), didn't god make us all? Why did he make a mistake and make us bad?